Alignment Forum and LessWrong · Forum post · Alignment Forum
Some “coherence arguments” are two different things in a trenchcoat
Read at alignmentforum.org ↗Read at sourceNo licence statement found
Outline · 74 paragraphs
- tl;dr¶2
- 1. An example “coherence argument” that I’ll focus on for most of the post¶4
- 2. My headline claim¶8
- 3. (Backstory of this post)¶21
- 4. The two things wearing a trenchcoat¶28
- 4.1 “Thing A” is about market participants who wind up with a smaller fraction of the wealth by mistake¶29
- 4.2 “Thing B” is about market participants who wind up with a smaller fraction of the wealth on purpose¶32
- 5. Why do I feel so strongly that we need to take the trenchcoat off?¶40
- 5.1 “Solving for equilibrium”: often a good starting point for Thing A, but rarely for Thing B¶43
- 5.2 Applicability to AI¶51
- 6. Two other “coherence arguments” that share the same trenchcoat issue¶56
- 7. Conclusion¶65